About Me

Name: BLOGASSAULT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Reserve Your Seat On The Ark

     Greenpeace has posted this link highlighting a replica of Noah's Ark on Mt. Ararat. The fear of sea level rise due to global warming brought about this idea to draw awareness to the problem and convince world leaders to draw up a climate pact for reduction of emissions.

ark

The re-creation of the famous Noah's Ark took Greenpeace four weeks to assemble. 20 German and Turkish carpenters used 424 feet of wood to build the 108 x 43 x 43 foot ship at 11,844 feet above sea level. The sturdy, solid ship will stay on the mountain and serve as a hut and safe place for mountaineers.
   
     How many trees were lost making this thing? And how did they convince the Turkish government to let them on the mountain anyway? From what I understood, they would not let people climb the mountain, due to religious concerns.

    I guess that's not the case anymore.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Pledge Numbers

     I missed this on Live Earth's web site earlier. The have a counter on the right hand side of the home page that shows the amount of people who signed the pledge. At this time there are just a little over 160,000 who took the pledge. The counter goes to a million, so I am assuming they are falling well short of their goal. There were actually more concert attendees around the globe than the total number of pledgers who have signed so far. 
    At least they tried.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thoughts On The Climate Concert

     Saturday was the big 7-7-07 Live Earth climate concerts lead by Al Gore and Kevin Wall to raise awareness of the looming threat of global warming. So, part of the day I watched the concerts on Bravo, and found myself being tugged between great live performances, and long drawn-out politically charged rants about George Bush and the human races clamoring for the almighty dollar.
    The commentators on Bravo-tv who seemed completely inept, would stop performers on their way off the stage to ask them questions about what they do on personal level to be more "green". Patrick Stump, lead singer for Fall Out Boy was "Stumped" when asked why this concert was important to him. He did answer honestly though saying he wasn't really sure, he was just a "dumb rock musician".
    Melissa Etheridge seemed the most vocal, spending nearly her entire segment bashing George Bush, the Iraq war and asking the crowd "what happened to America?"  Using the opportunity as a soapbox to criticize every Republican President since Nixon, as well as claiming that she was no longer going to be "different",  she ended her segment by introducing Al Gore. 
     Melissa sure has changed. How did she go from this:


   

To this:



 Anyway, Leonardo DiCaprio made a heart felt speech...
    
LeoLeonardo DiCaprio speaks during the Live Earth concert at Giants Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey. (European Pressphoto Agency/Justin Lane)

    That was depressing...

Then he also introduced Al Gore...



Gore gave his pledge, and wanted all of us to do the same. No more CO2 contributing power plants! Vote for "green" candidates! Press for a global pact by 2009 for a 90% reduction of CO2 pollutants!
It was all very exciting..I guess.

    Yet, not everybody was in on this deal. This article points out some of the hypocrisies behind the event.

    All-in-all, it was not a bad event. There where a lot of great musical performances from a lot of star-power bands. The rhetoric was kept to a minimum, and they didn't ask for money, they simply asked for a pledge.
It is still brain washing, with all of the chanting music about climate change, but for those of us who can think on our own, it had no effect on our mental state. 
    I will do my part to help the environment, but I am still waiting for the PROOF that humans are the cause.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

First Climate Change Concert

     As I reported before, Al Gore's climate concerts scheduled all around the globe kicked off yesterday with a bang in Sydney, Australia. TimesOnline has the story.

Sounds like it was a hit, and they did manage to book a lot of great talent.

You have to give it to Al. He sure knows how to make things happen. He may be gullible to the global warming scientists, but he is an expert at selling it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Storing Energy

     I would have to agree with Instapundit on this. Battery power is the link to most electronics we have today, including our cellphones, laptops and one of my favorites, battery powered remote controlled cars. Storing power on a national level in our nation's power grid is one way of conserving energy in a rational way.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming And Taxes

     Here is another article asking why elected officials are not spending enough time with their constituents teaching them about the perils of climate change. 
    The media is on it's final sales pitch. They are on the closing line. "When are you dummies in the general public going to get with the program and realize that global warming is real and you must pay for it?"
    When will the media get it that we are leery of the whole thing? They want to tax us to death on something that may turn out to be nothing more than a bad forecast. Show us the PROOF, then we will have a discussion. Just because Al Gore, the left-wing media, and some European scientists think we are doomed doesn't mean we are. The American public is not stupid.

    Here is my favorite line in the story:

    When the market, on its own, fails to arrive at the proper price for goods and services, it’s the job of government to correct the failure. There are two ways to do so: higher taxes and new regulation. 

Translation: More money for more government. Their answer is Economic Socialism...yeah, that's the ticket!
    Does not the market always determine the price? When in the 1970's OPEC cut production, the price went through the roof. What is so hard to understand? Supply and Demand. Today it is fear based; a war in Iraq, terrorism, and the Israel-Palestinian conflict. All middle-eastern problems, and right where the oil is.    
 Just another reason, 37 years later, we need to get off their oil and use our own, along with responsible renewable energy and cleaner technology. Their are better answers to the problem. 
    Unfortunately, the environmental movement won't allow us to drill here. Or off shore. We might kill a bug or something. It will endanger the Brown Spotted Red-Necked Three Legged Whooping Pigeon.


 I for one am not convinced of their science regarding global warming. We can clean our air of pollutants without taxes, and without regulation. And once they can for certain tell us that carbon dioxide is the problem, then we can talk drastic measures.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Retrofiting Diesels

     This LA Times editorial talks about retrofitting older model diesel engines to meet current standards. It also makes spectacular claims of how these engines are killing people. Then the mortality rates of diesel mechanics must be phenomenal. Fantastic claims I would like to see documented.
    Obviously, there are a lot of people who have no idea how much this will cost per vehicle, wether it's a diesel truck or a piece of equipment. Most older diesel ran on a mechanical type system. All new diesels use computers to guide the fuel delivery system. All these diesels would have to be completely re-wired and new components would have to be installed to retrofit sensors and timing equipment. Older diesel engines were not built with electrical switches and sensors in mind. So several new types of solutions would have to found. But what would more than likely happen is the manufacturers would sell a kit. It would include a new engine and all the computer and sensor components, along with updated parts to finish the retrofit.
    The cost of this kit, especially for some small business owners, would bankrupt several of them, and small business is the backbone of this country. All that would survive from this are the very large and cash rich companies. It would merge others, like what happened in the Heavy-Duty Truck market, with several OEM's and diesel engine manufacturing companies merging because of the cost of development concerning the new emission standards. 
    By the estimates in the article it would amount to nearly $27,000 per unit in California, which I think is under what it would actually cost. So, a company that owns 50 pieces of equipment (which would not be that unusual) would be forced to cough up over $1.3 million dollars to meet the new requirements. How many companies in California could afford that? Not many would be my guess.
It also quote's the growing commercial business in California, so that must mean that those construction companies are making at least a 100% profit margin...Please. Inflation is low, and that is an indicator that business is running lean a competition is hot. 
Finally, the statement at the end:

It's possible to be both pro-business and pro-environment, but when those values conflict, one has to make painful choices — choices that the governor all too often tries to duck. Cleaning up is expensive, and polluters are going to have to foot the bill. If Schwarzenegger is serious about fighting pollution, he should publicly back the construction-equipment rules. 
    
    Obviously, you cannot be pro-business in this matter, as it is so eloquently stated above. 
    And polluters will have to foot the bill, huh? The construction companies you will be penalizing didn't know when they purchased their diesel equipment that they would later be called polluters. Those machines meet the standards at the time of purchase, and the manufacturer who built it did the same. Convenient, isn't it?

    
    
    
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Disney's Fireworks Display's

     Disney world has changed the way fireworks are being used by creating a more environmentally safe way of launching. They use compressed air to send them into the night sky instead of black powder. 
    No more smoke filling the air and your nose, or the loud screeching as the flaming ball of fire shoots toward the sky.

    They just took half the fun out of it!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Environment, Fireworks, Bonfires, And Hedgehogs

     If you will be having a fireworks display tonight to celebrate our nations independence, read these few guidelines for having a safe and pet friendly experience. 

Ban the Bang in Fireworks campaign

And they say they are not "killjoys". Maybe I am missing some subliminal message in the poster above?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Our Nation's Birthday

 I wrote this in response to this editorial in the Rocky Mountain News. It struck me how many people might read this article and not know what he/she is talking about.

In the July 4, 2007 editorial “The nation’s birthday-Adams foresaw nature of the celebration”, you present us with a few words from the founders that portray the nation’s mind-set at the time. Now, fast forward 231 years later, and those words have become lost or forgotten on our citizens.

On Sean Hannity’s daytime radio talk show he does a “man on the street” segment where he sends an intern down to the streets of New York and asks passers-by a series of questions about our government. On Tuesday’s show he asked some basic Fourth of July questions. I used to be amazed by the lack of knowledge of the common citizen, but anymore it’s just dull-surprise.

The questions he presented were as follows:

1) What is July 4th? Answer: Independence day

2) Who did we win our Independence from? Answer: England

3) What was the name of the war we fought to win our independence? Answer: Revolutionary war

4) Who wrote the Declaration of Independence? Answer: Thomas Jefferson

All pretty basic questions, right? Of course, you have to wonder if it’s all staged, and if the people were hand-picked before they get on the air.

Anyway, out of the four of five citizens quizzed, all got the first question correct, but only one person could answer the next two, and no one got the last one. So I used the same questions and asked several of my customers through out the day and was not surprised to see the same results that Hannity got.

Hannity’s last question to them was whether they vote Democrat or Republican. Of course, being in New York it’s an obvious answer. But the people I asked are all pretty much Republican. So it doesn’t really matter based on party lines who could answer the questions or not. Nobody seems to know their history any longer, which is sad.

We obviously do not make it a priority to teach American history in our schools, and by the people I talked too, it just isn’t that important. Men like John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington along with the brave men and women of early America, fought and gave their lives for what we have today; FREEDOM. Do we not owe them respect for all eternity, at least one day every year, the knowledge that we know where we came from, and the sacrifices made?

So, let us not forget. Set down your iphone and your latte and read a book on what was done to create this great and wonderful country we live in. Sacrifice just a little of your time to learning what gives you the ability to live free. Outside of the problems in the world today, and the growing pains of our past, we still live in the greatest country ever constructed by the human mind. We owe it to future generations to keep our history alive.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nuclear Is Hot Again

     Time Magazine had this article discussing the resurgence of  nuclear energy and the role it could play in our increasing energy needs. Usually, Time is a bent a little to the left, but this article was a good summary of what the most important issue are with nuclear power. 
    Nuclear power is a good way of producing clean energy, but there is waste. Until we can solve the waste issue, I think Nuclear power should stay on the back burner. In this country we tend to rush into things trying to solve some problem, not realizing what we are doing is causing another. It is that way with nuclear power, we want to rush to build these without having a viable system in place to dispose of the waste.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Live Earth Concert Update

     Finally got a list of entertainers who will be performing at the Live Earth Concerts around the globe. I had mentioned last week that their web site didn't have a list put together of who would be playing. 
    
    This spot gives a list of performers who have signed on to play at various locations. One of those bands is a reunited Spinal Tap! I would actually buy tickets for that!


May 23, 2007

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »