About Me

Name:Aaron McLucas
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

European Ski Resorts Have To Offer Summer Sports

   This Free Republic link is quite interesting since what they are saying they have to do is something that american ski resorts have been doing for years. The comment section to this Free Republic article is quite funny. Here is the first one:
 
To: PROCON

You know, I noticed that my left front tire was a bit low this morning.

The cause?

Global warming.

3 posted on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 1:26:36 PM by RexBeach
 
So true, so true.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Car Dealers God, Guns, And Gas Giveaway!!!

   Just in case your in the market for a new car AND a new gun, why not go to this dealership. Now this is my kind of car dealer!!! They have lots of popular brands and you get a GUN!...for FREE!!!
 
It was all brought to my attention by a friend of mine who emailed an article from the Kansas City Star, talking about someone who had emailed them about some car dealer giving away guns if they bought a car and if that was legal or not.
 
   Well, no, they can’t give a gun to just anyone. (FYI, the U.S. Supreme Court in March agreed for the first time in 69 years to take up a significant case concerning interpretation of the Second Amendment involving gun ownership — a decision is expected next month.)
And any customer of Max Motors who buys a new or used car can opt for a coupon for $250 in gas or a check for a local dealer good toward the purchase of a gun with the requisite background check.
 
   Local business helping local business...I like it!
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ad Campaign Targeting Lieberman-Warner Climate Bill

   An advocacy group is buying air time to fight the upcoming Warner-Lieberman global warming bill, targeting some senators that have signed on to the bill.
 
   "Congress is at it again," a television ad airing in Tennessee says. "This time they're pushing massive new taxes and regulation in the name of global warming. But let's ask ourselves, are the unproven benefits of legislation worth the major job losses, new taxes and increased energy costs that could result?
"Call Senator Lamar Alexander and tell him to vote no on the Lieberman-Warner climate bill. Tennesseans just can't afford another huge, costly government program."
 
The sad thing is that so many that are supporting this stupid bill are republicans.
They have certainly lost their way.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Larry David An Energy Pig?

   Maybe Larry is no longer required to drive the Prius?
 
The one who left the lights on
Yes, those lights. On all night. Even the compact fluorescents burn fuel. When "Curb Your Enthusiasm'' curmudgeon Larry David split from his environmentalist wife, Laurie, he said he went home and "turned all the lights on.'' Take that, polar bears!
 
 
The one who left the lights on Yes, those lights. On all night. Even the compact fluorescents burn fuel. When 'Curb Your Enthusiasm'' curmudgeon Larry David split from his environmentalist wife, Laurie, he said he went home and 'turned all the lights on.'' Take that, polar bears!
 
Somethings are just not meant to last.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming: The Lawsuit

   Lawyers suing energy companies for coastal erosion in Alaska.
 
The suit makes two main points: First, that the fossil-fuel baddies "are responsible for a substantial portion of the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere that have caused global warming and Kivalina's special injuries." The suit also accuses ExxonMobil, British Petroleum, Duke Energy et al, of funding questionable scientific research that covers up their culpability in global warming.
 
   The article goes on to explain how much money is in play here, rather than the issue of the environment.
 
   No court in the land is going to let lawyers get rich off this kind of frivolity, I hear you thinking. Think again. Hagens Berman played a key role in the groundbreaking, multi-state litigation against the tobacco companies, and now they are going back for more. "It's the same game plan that brought down Big Tobacco," Stephan Faris writes in the current issue of The Atlantic.
 
   Money-money-money-moooneeeeey...mooooney. Sing along with me...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Clean Coal In Australia

   Some countries have no problem with turning to clean coal as a viable alternative to clean up their energy sources. In Austalia, some are upset that the country is not converting to it fast enough.  It's the opposite here in the United States. The U.S. government has offered that as a inexpensive way, along with other renewable energies, of reducing our carbon output that will give us short term results without costing the taxpayer billions of dollars to produce. Notice the first paragraph of the article:
 
Possibly offsetting criticism, the Bush administration wants to spend $2 billion on research into so-called clean coal technology aimed at reducing dirty emissions from coal-burning power plants.
 
Avoid criticism and 'so-called' clean coal? The U.S. news media is not skeptical about that are they? Here is what clean coal is.
  • Coal cleaning by 'washing' has been standard practice in developed countries for some time. It reduces emissions of ash and sulfur dioxide when the coal is burned.
  • Electrostatic precipitators and fabric filters can remove 99% of the fly ash from the flue gases - these technologies are in widespread use.
  • Flue gas desulfurisation reduces the output of sulfur dioxide to the atmosphere by up to 97%, the task depending on the level of sulfur in the coal and the extent of the reduction. It is widely used where needed in developed countries.
  • Low-NOx burners allow coal-fired plants to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions by up to 40%. Coupled with re-burning techniques NOx can be reduced 70% and selective catalytic reduction can clean up 90% of NOx emissions.
  • Increased efficiency of plant - up to 45% thermal efficiency now (and 50% expected in future) means that newer plants create less emissions per kWh than older ones.
  • Advanced technologies such as Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) and Pressurised Fluidised Bed Combustion (PFBC) will enable higher thermal efficiencies still - up to 50% in the future.
  • Ultra-clean coal from new processing technologies which reduce ash below 0.25% and sulfur to very low levels mean that pulverised coal might be fed directly into gas turbines with combined cycle and burned at high thermal efficiency.
  • Gasification, including underground gasification in situ, uses steam and oxygen to turn the coal into carbon monoxide and hydrogen.
  • Sequestration refers to disposal of liquid carbon dioxide, once captured, into deep geological strata.
Coal is carbon heavy, but here is why you can't simply stop using it:
Coal is an extremely important fuel and will remain so. Some 23% of primary energy needs are met by coal and 39% of electricity is generated from coal. About 70% of world steel production depends on coal feedstock. Coal is the world's most abundant and widely distributed fossil fuel source. The International Energy Agency expects a 43% increase in its use from 2000 to 2020.
 
Untill we can get other sources of renewables on line and at an affordable rate, coal will be with us for quite a while.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Getting A Global Warming Commitment

   The Kyoto treaty is running out and after a couple of different summits on a new treaty, nobody wants to commit. So the G8 ministers want to set the stage for the upcoming summit in Toyako, Japan.
 
Environment chiefs from the world's top industrial countries pledged ''strong political will'' Monday toward cutting greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2050, declaring that developed nations should take the lead in battling global warming.
The statement by ministers from the Group of Eight nations, however, stopped short of pledging firm commitments for mid-century or a midterm goal for 2020, which many countries argue are crucial to saving the planet from environmental crisis provoked by rising temperatures.
 
   Sounds like what came from the summit in Bali, Indonesia; a commitment to have a summit about making a commitment.
The goals are too high and the price is too much.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »