About Me

Name: BLOGASSAULT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Job Openings In The Climate Market

   Here is another list of current job openings in the exciting field of climate hysteria!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Senator Dick Durbin Wants to Buy You A New Car!

  Does Senator Durbin have nothing better to do than introduce bills that have no hope of passing?
 
   A bill was introduced in the Senate earlier this month that seeks to offer a $10,000 incentive for low-income families to trade in their old cars for newer, more fuel efficient models. First, a few details: eligible individuals are those who earn less than $25K per year (or $40K for families). Eligible automobiles include those made by manufacturers with US operations that have assembled autos in the US throughout the last 20 years; are rated at 25 miles per gallon or better and are at least 4.9 mpg better than the car that's being traded in. Eligible trade-ins must run, must be at least 10 years old and must be registered in the name of the eligible individual. Trade-ins would be destroyed at the cost of the government.
 
Although, with Obama coming and the democrats controling the whole thing, anything is possible, I suppose.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Population Control And The Environment

   Last week I put up a post on some questions that the New York Times climate writer, Andrew C. Revkin would like to see Obama's science team answer. The one that caught my attention was the one on population growth.
   Well, it seems Obama's choice for science advisor, John Holden has already had some thoughts on that question. This is from SmallDeadAnimals, discussing all the newly labeled "climate refugees" the IPCC says will be chocking the world by 2050 and, of course, that will need to be dealt with.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ethanol Industry Needs A Bailout Now

   From Planet Gore:
   The commodity bust has clobbered corn ethanol, whose energy inefficiencies require high oil prices to be competitive. The price of ethanol at the pump has fallen nearly in half in recent months to $1.60 from $2.90 per gallon due to lower commodity prices, and that lower price now barely covers production costs even after accounting for federal subsidies. Three major producers are in or near bankruptcy, including giant VeraSun Energy.
 
Being that regular unleaded fuel can be purchased in most places in the country for less than that, and never mind the fact that ethanol is subsidized and burns less effecient then regular fuel anyway,  I say let them fail.
Eventually the government will learn that the only time most people will take the environmetally friendly way is when it is cheaper and/or more convenient. Besides, is that not the way our econmy has always worked in the U.S.?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

James Hansen: Let's Redistribute A Carbon Tax

   All this time I thought James Hansen, chief of the Goddard Institute of Space Studies and global warming alarmist, was interested in solving the climate crisis. Come to find out he is just like all the other lefty nutters; what he is really interested in is spreading mine and yours wealth. Here is a letter that Mr. Hansen wrote to President elect Obama on a proposed carbon tax to help under priviledged citizens.
 
The public will support the tax if it is returned to them, equal shares on a per capita basis (half shares for children up to a maximum of two child-shares per family), deposited monthly in bank accounts. No large bureaucracy is needed. A person reducing his carbon footprint more than average makes money. A person with large cars and a big house will pay a tax much higher than the dividend
 
The carbon tax has social benefits. It is progressive. It is useful to those most in need in hard times, providing them an opportunity for larger dividend than tax.
“Cap and trade” generates special interests, lobbyists, and trading schemes, yielding non productive millionaires, all at public expense. The public is fed up with such business. Tax with 100% dividend, in contrast, would spur our economy, while aiding the disadvantaged, the climate, and our national security. [...]
 
    Like Mr. Hansen, I too think cap and trade is a scam. But tying redistribution of wealth into a carbon tax is purely a far left idea that will accomplish nothing.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Even In San Francisco You Can't Make Everybody Green

   Officials in San Francisco are thinking about charging $6 dollars to drive downtown in an attempt to ease congestion and pollution.
 
Making drivers pay extra to drive downtown at peak hours may have failed in New York, but surely in environmentally-friendly San Francisco congestion pricing enjoys broad support? Not quite, notes the L.A. Times:

Such a plan might sound like a slam-dunk here, in the first American metropolis to ban plastic shopping bags — where officials considered tapping pet feces for fuel instead of sending it to the landfill, the mayor banned the use of city funds to buy bottled water (too much garbage), and the bicycle lobby is a force to be reckoned with. But reaction to the plan’s recent rollout has ranged from lukewarm to downright hostile.

Plenty of local residents are aghast at the prospect of paying $6 a day to drive into—or simply pass through—the city. Local businesses are worried the proposed plan, if enacted, would drive off shoppers and force an exodus to cheaper pastures.
 
   But this line about sums up things for most people...
 
Public opposition to congestion pricing in San Francisco echoes a theme that pops up whenever environmental concerns collide with greenbacks: Environmental ideas sound great, until people see the pricetag.
   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sydney's Fireworks Went Green

   I guess Sydney, Australia decided to have a fireworks display that had less of a footprint for this years New Years display. Of course, there is no proof offered as to how they are doing it.
 
   Personally, I prefer shooting off my own, it is a lot more fun.
Unfortunantly for these fella's in Naples, Italy, they are stuck between a rock and hard place when it comes to shooting off their own fireworks.
 
Some women in Naples said they won't make love if their men shoot off dangerous fireworks on New Year's Eve. "Se Spari, Niente Sesso" (If you shoot, no sex), as the reported group calls itself, claims to have signed up hundreds of women in the Naples area to combat celebrations that injure or maim hundreds each year.
 
   Sex or fireworks...Sex or fireworks...Man, that is tough!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Seasonal Snowpack Above Average...Again

   Here are just a few stories from around Colorado.
Steamboat, Colorado.    In Vail, Colorado we have two stories. This one from earlier this year, and this one from this last week.
 
Here are the actual readings for all of colorado from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, NRCS. Seems to be no lack of snowfall here or has been for several years now. More proof that global warming is coming to an end? Maybe. Maybe not.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

11 Questions For Obama's Science Team

   Some of the questions would be interesting to know how Obama's team would answer them. Other questions are simply ridiculous.
Like this one..
 
6. Will Population Be a Priority?
 .Dr. Holdren has been clear for many years about the threat that is potentially posed to the family of humanity and life as we know it by the huge scale and fully anticipated, unregulated increase of absolute global human population numbers in Century XXI.
 
   Can't you just see someone from Obama's science team saying, "You know that is a real issue that will need to be addressed in the coming years. Of course population control is already being done in China and the model has worked well for them. If we here in the U.S. adopted a simular program, we could save millions of lives later. The decreased stress on our natural resources by instituting some kind of population control, on it's own, would probably solve global warming!"
 
   Sounds kind of simular to the stem cell arguement. If we could harvest fetal stem cells from aborted children we could cure diseases and save millions of lives. This group of organized religions even say as much.
   

  
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345Next »