About Me

Name: Average Voter
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Going Nutty

   Because global warming took the year off in Massachusetts and instead was cool and it rained and rained and rained, the oak trees are exacting their revenge.
 
Massachusetts residents say they are under siege from this year’s large crop of acorns as the hard nuts have been falling from trees like rain.

Greg Roberson and Neil McIsaac of Brookline, Mass., said they routinely encounter the nuts as they fall from area oak trees, creating safety hazards while in the air and once on the ground, The Boston Globe reported Saturday.

“Every time I hear one, I think it’s a kid throwing a rock at me,” Roberson said. “They’re falling everywhere.”

“I’ve nearly broken my neck several times,” McIsaac offered. “There are tons of them.”
 
   See, there are some good things about global warming!
 
View Image
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

International Day Of Climate Action

   You have less than a month to sign up for Climate Action Day!
 
   The website is 350.org. The 350 stands for parts per million of CO2.
 
  • And what does this 350 number even mean?

    350 is the number that leading scientists say is the safe upper limit for carbon dioxide—measured in "Parts Per Million" in our atmosphere. 350 PPM—it's the number humanity needs to get back to as soon as possible to avoid runaway climate change.

  • If we're already past 350, are we all doomed?

    No. We're like the patient that goes to the doctor and learns he's overweight, or his cholesterol is too high. He doesn't die immediately—but until he changes his lifestyle and gets back down to the safe zone, he's at more risk for heart attack or stroke. The planet is in its danger zone because we've poured too much carbon into the atmosphere, and we're starting to see signs of real trouble: melting ice caps, rapidly spreading drought. We need to scramble back as quickly as we can to safety.

  •    I sure am glad were not doomed! Guess we better get "scrambling" back to 350 though!
    Meet the whole 350.org Team...
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Sailing To Australia On Two Liters

       David de Rothschild is going to make a point to all of us by sailing from San Francisco Bay to Australia in his 60 foot catamaran made of plastic 2-liter bottles.
     
       Pier 31 is ground zero for Plastiki, the strangest-looking boat ever built in San Francisco, a fantastic vessel, a twin-hulled catamaran 60 feet long, made of 12,000 2-liter plastic drink bottles filled with dry ice. It's bound to a frame made of woven plastic, held together with heat-welded tape and steel bolts.  

     It's an expedition that has made headlines: David de Rothschild, tall, aristocratic and determined to succeed, plans to sail the Plastiki out the Golden Gate this fall and across the Pacific 11,000 miles to Australia to make the point that waste is bad, the planet is in trouble, and adventure is its own reward.

       Well, good for him. I have a question for him though. Is he doing this to show how many great uses are contained within the 2-liter plastic bottle? Seriously though, I wish we could actually do something about the problem of trash in the ocean rather than sailing over the Pacific in a plastic bottle hoping somebody is paying attention. 

    Bottles-net-500

       
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Frequency Up - Intensity Unchanged

       A new study out of Clemson University shows that the number of hurricanes has generally increased in just the last few years, but there is no evidence that intensity or landfall has increased.
    “This is a hot button in the argument for global warming,” said Lund. “Climatologists reporting to the U.S. Senate as recently as this summer testified to the exact opposite of what we find. Many researchers have maintained that warming waters of the Atlantic are increasing the strengths of these storms. We do not see evidence for this at all, however we do find that the number of storms has recently increased.”
     
       This study was done by mathmatical statisticians rather than so called climate experts, so the numbers seemed to add up as you would expect the too. Now, trying to understand their actual study is a whole other project. But the conclusion sums it up pretty well.
     
    Contrary to some theories, we nd no evidence of signi cant recent increases in storm strength or US landfall strike probability. We do, however, nd recent increases in storm frequencies circa 1995. Changepoints in many of the cyclone covariates are found circa1960, which coincides with the onset of satellite surveillance. We also nd changepoints in the peak wind speeds of the storms circa 1900 and 1960. The circa 1995 changepoint in frequency is possibly explained by the increase of short-duration weak storms in the recent record (Vecchi 2008; Landsea et al. 2009) and/or climate change.
     
       Take the climate scientist out of it and add the statistical mathmatician and you get a completely different result.
     
     
      
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    The War On Your Behind

       Here is another story out of the LA Times Environmetal section that proves once again that nothing is off limits when it comes to what the enviro-nutters will attack.
     
    There is a battle for America's behinds.

    It is a fight over toilet paper: the kind that is blanket-fluffy and getting fluffier so fast that manufacturers are running out of synonyms for "soft" (Quilted Northern Ultra Plush is the first big brand to go three ply and three adjective).

    It's a menace, environmental groups say -- and a dark-comedy example of American excess.

    The reason, they say, is that plush U.S. toilet paper is usually made by chopping down and grinding up trees that were decades or even a century old. Environmentalists want Americans, like Europeans, to wipe with tissue made from recycled paper goods.

    And, activists say, there's just the foolish idea of the thing: old trees cut down for the briefest and most undignified of ends.

       It is noted in the story that toilet paper and facial tissue combined accounts for only 5% of the forest industy. Seems they would want to target a segment of the industy that constitutes a larger part of the supposed problem. 
     
       We just need to go back to the old days...the outhouse and some leaves, or your, ehhh, hand.
     

    Springfield MO outhouse, still standing from the 1900's!

     
     
       

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    But wait...there is this solution as well...
    The Bidet Toilet Seat Store                      HI-3001 Elongated Bidet Toilet Seat
     
    Then you don't even need TP!
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Testing The Data Behind The Science

       That is how science usually works. But that doesn't apply to those who's job it is to supply data to the IPCC.
     
    In the early 1980s, with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy, scientists at the United Kingdom’s University of East Anglia established the Climate Research Unit (CRU) to produce the world’s first comprehensive history of surface temperature. It’s known in the trade as the “Jones and Wigley” record for its authors, Phil Jones and Tom Wigley, and it served as the primary reference standard for the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) until 2007. It was this record that prompted the IPCC to claim a “discernible human influence on global climate.”
     
    Putting together such a record isn’t at all easy. Weather stations weren’t really designed to monitor global climate. Long-standing ones were usually established at points of commerce, which tend to grow into cities that induce spurious warming trends in their records. Trees grow up around thermometers and lower the afternoon temperature. Further, as documented by the University of Colorado’s Roger Pielke Sr., many of the stations themselves are placed in locations, such as in parking lots or near heat vents, where artificially high temperatures are bound to be recorded.

    So the weather data that go into the historical climate records that are required to verify models of global warming aren’t the original records at all. Jones and Wigley, however, weren’t specific about what was done to which station in order to produce their record, which, according to the IPCC, showed a warming of 0.6° +/– 0.2°C in the 20th century.

    Now begins the fun. Warwick Hughes, an Australian scientist, wondered where that “+/–” came from, so he politely wrote Phil Jones in early 2005, asking for the original data. Jones’s response to a fellow scientist attempting to replicate his work was, “We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?”

       Of course, that is the whole point of science, to test, retest, and test again to make sure the theory is correct. Once it is verified, then it can be used for factual data. But like so many things that revolve around the U.N., the same rules don't apply.
     
       The story goes on to explain the level of elitism the surrounds the academic world and the lies associated with it.
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Even More California Controls

       What more can California do to control the way you live? Let me count the ways. It would seem that every week those stewards of populace control in Sacremento are introducing another fantastic way of imposing some type of control over you or your business.
     
       This week they have decided that big screen tv's are sucking too much energy out of the grid.
     
    Concerned that the growing popularity of big-screen televisions could make it harder for California to keep pace with electricity demand, state energy regulators are poised to crack down on energy-guzzling sets despite opposition from a powerful electronics trade group.

    The first-in-the-nation TV efficiency standards would require electronics retailers to sell only energy-sipping models starting in 2011. Even tougher efficiency criteria would follow in 2013.
     
       Of course, electronics retailers are not happy with this deal.
     
    About a quarter of currently available television models would have to be pulled from store shelves, said Doug Johnson, senior director for technology policy with the Arlington, Va., group that represents TV makers, distributors, retailers and installers.

    That could raise television prices, put home theater installers and wholesalers out of business and destroy jobs, he said.

    The association contends that the regulations would force TV buyers to buy banned sets from out-of-state dealers over the Internet, depriving California retailers of customers and state and local governments of needed sales tax and corporate income tax revenue.
     
       And so it goes in the greatest nany state in the union.

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Dear Earth Talk...

       ...has global warming killed people?
     
       Is hunting good or bad for the environment?
     
       I heard cars can run on water. Is that true?
     
    Yep, those are real questions given to EarthTalk, a question section on the emagazine.com site; the E/ environmental magazine website
     
       Get a subsription to the magazine. Or not.
     
       
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Compelling Reporting-Is Surfing Greem?

       Is surfing green? Are the products you use to wax your board environmentally safe? Are all the eco-freindly products really "eco-friendly"? These questions and many more are addressed in this compelling TimesOnline article.
     
       I am being fecicious, of course. But I link this article because like surfing wax that is petroleum based, yet wears a green badge of eco-friendlyness on the label, so many other products you see in the store today are doing the same.
     
       Having something on the label that identifies the product as green or envoronmentally safe is the new buzz in marketing. Just go to Target or Wal-Mart and look at the labeling of different products. It would seem that everything has some kind of "green" marketing design attached to it. Whole new market segments have come to market becuase of this green wave.
     
       Go to some of the websites of some of the largest companies and you will find layers upon layers of pages showing how environmentally resposible they have become. Companies like Johnson and Johnson, Procter and Gamble, Sony, and many others are all trying to prove that they thinking green. That is a good thing. But many companies are simply jumping on the boat to look good. It's called "greenwashing".
     
    Greenwashing is a form of corporate misrepresentation where a company will present a green public image and publicize green initiatives that are false or misleading. A company might release misleading claims or even true green initiatives while privately engaging in environmentally damaging practices. Companies are trying to take advantage of the growing public concern and awareness for environmental issues by promoting an environmentally responsible image.
     
       I suspect there is alot of that going on. Margeting is a slippery slope of half truths and clever presentations of suspect products. It is always up to the consumer to verify the products they use. One thing is for sure though, msot people including myself who have purchased so called green products have found they don't work as well, and returned to what they were using before. Clorox came out with a whole new line of green products called Green Works. The green in the name maybe true, but the works part is a joke.

       Being green is still, in the end, a marketing ploy that has become a money making proposition for most companies. Like so many other things, it is more than likely a fad. Before too long, a new marketing campaign will drive the market leaving green in the dust.
     
       
     
       
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Fear Mongering In The News

       Found this article in the Seattle Times from a couple of weeks ago. It would seem that millions are going to starve to death becuase of climate change.
     
       Millions of people in Nepal face severe food shortages because global climate change has disrupted weather patterns and slashed crop yields in the Himalayan nation, an international aid agency warned Friday.

    Changing weather patterns have dramatically affected crop production in Nepal, leaving farmers unable to properly feed themselves and pushing them into debt, Oxfam International said in a report released in Katmandu.

    The British aid agency described the situation as "deeply worrying."
     
       If you type in 'food shortage Nepal' into the search engine of Yahoo, you will get 2,090,000 hits.
     
       If you go to NepalNews.com, there is not one single word of starving people or weird weather, or anything for that matter indicating that Nepal is having trouble with food production. Nobody in Nepal seems to be "deeply worried" about the weather patterns or any starvation scenarios. They seem more worried about Maoists taking over the country, which would probably guarantee a food shortage.
     
       The Prime Minister of Nepal will be in the US in a couple of weeks and will meet with President Obama to discuss the on going peace process in Nepal; not food shortages and starvation.
     
       This begs the question, what is news and what isn't? It would seem that the media decides that for us.
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Is The Ice Coming Or Going?

       As we all heard about in 2007, that was the worst year in Arctic ice cover since monitoring started in 1979. Now there is a lot of talk about opening up a passage for ships that would cut the cost by billions of dollars to shipping companies because of the much shorter route by cutting through the Arctic. But is it still shrinking? This article seems to want to draw some concern towards the the melting of ice. Yet, since 2007 it has started to grow again
       In 2007, the ice shrunk to 4.13 million square miles, the smallest amount of ice coverage since record keeping.

    The consistently severe retreats in recent years have prompted dire warnings from some scientists, who say ice-free Arctic summers may be just years away. That phenomenon, they say, would accelerate global warming and threaten the survival of polar bears, which feed primarily along ice edges.

    The shrinking extent of Arctic ice is only part of the picture. U.S. scientists have released several studies this year pointing to a rapid thinning of ice cover even in areas where melting has been incomplete.

    In July, in a landmark five-year study based on satellite data compiled from 2004-08, scientists from NASA and the University of Washington showed that, "for the first time on record," the Arctic now contained a greater expanse of fragile, first-year ice than the traditionally durable multi-year ice.
     
       But in the same article, we discover that the melting and shrinking is going the other direction.

    "While this year's minimum ice extent will probably not reach the record low of 2007, it remains well below normal," the Colorado-based National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) reports in its latest summary of Arctic ice conditions.

    The all-time biggest retreat was recorded in 2007 at 4.13 million square kilometres, and the 2008 retreat fell just short of that record.
     
       So that would mean the each year since 2007, the arctic ice melt has slowed down. That is only two years, so a turn around may be short lived, but lets look at another clue in the article.
     
    But while the Northern Sea Route along Russia's Arctic coast was passable this summer, the Northwest Passage through Canada's Arctic archipelago did not open as much this year as it did in 2007 and 2008.

    "Satellite images show that the shallow and narrow southern route, which (Norwegian explorer Roald) Amundsen navigated in 1905, appeared to open briefly this August," the NSIDC report states. "This route was also open in 2007 and 2008. The deeper northern route, of great interest for potential commercial transport, was open in 2007 but is still blocked by ice this year."

    The Canadian Ice Service, an Environment Canada agency that monitors northern shipping conditions, confirmed the Northwest Passage has remained largely blocked by ice this summer.

       Just so you don't miss it, a Norwegian sxplorer navigated the southern route in 1905. So in the past, long before we started keeping records of Arctic melt each year, people were crossing parts of the Arctic. This would seem to indicate that this happens on a regular basis, and maybe not so out of the ordinary. Only time will tell whether or not this trend of decreased ice melt will continue. 

     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Van Jones Resigns-Glenn Beck Wins

       So, according to the Huffington Post, the reason Van Jones resigned as Green Jobs Czar is because of Glenn Beck's distortion of the facts, not because he is a radical nutter.
     
    Glenn Beck has his first scalp. Van Jones, under fire from the extremist television show host for his background in radical activism, has resigned from the administration.
     
       Oooh, that's right, Glenn Beck is the "extremist". I almost forgot!
    Actually, Glenn Beck is a talk show host and entertainer, not a member of the White House administration. There is a difference.
     
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    If We Give Up-They give up

       I am not sure what to think of this video:
     
     
       The creater of this video needs to take a vacation or maybe worse, talk to a certified psycotherapist.
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Jonah Goldberg's Opinion

       Jonah Goldberg had an opinion piece in the LA Times last week that was quite entertaining.
     
    No, I'm not denying that man-made pollution and other activity have played a role in planetary warming since the Industrial Revolution.

    But we live in a moment when we are told, nay lectured and harangued, that if we use the wrong toilet paper or eat the wrong cereal, we are frying the planet. But the sun? Well, that's a distraction. Don't you dare forget your reusable shopping bags, but feel free to pay no attention to that burning ball of gas in the sky -- it's just the only thing that prevents the planet from being a lifeless ball of ice engulfed in total darkness. Never mind that sunspot activity doubled during the 20th century, when the bulk of global warming has taken place.
     
       Thank you, Jonah for telling the story behind the story.
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Transfer Of Wealth On A Global Scale

       A United Nations report says rich countries need to give to poor countries to combat climate change, to the tune of $600 Billion.
     
    Developing countries need between $500 billion and $600 billion a year from rich nations to adapt to climate change and make sure their economies grow, a United Nations report concluded yesterday.

    Poor nations need to join in the fight against climate change, but they will do so only if their economies are growing. That means getting massive help now from rich countries so poor nations can use clean energy for their new industries, according to the UN’s World Economic and Social Survey 2009.

    If developing countries simply grow the same way industrialized countries did, this will have a “devastating’’ impact on the earth’s climate, the 207-page report stated.
     
       If you look carefully at the statement you can see it. If this was just about the climate, then this would make sense. But it is not. It is about giving money to poor nations so they can grow their economy; or more simply I believe, a transfer wealth. Of course, they would like them to build clean energy. But do we really think this is what the money will be used for? How much money has gone to poor countries around the world only to be pocketed by the countries corrupt regime leaders and their lackies to buy guns to fight their neighbors.  
     
       I am sure they mean well, but this is just a dumb idea. Let's let them earn it instead.
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous12Next »