About Me

Name: Average Voter
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

What Do You Say To This?

   Here is another story that when you see the headline you don't know whether to laugh or scream.

Poor Women Bear Brunt of Global Warming

Where will the water come from? Women in the developing world are set to suffer most as global temperatures rise.
Zoom
Getty Images

Where will the water come from? Women in the developing world are set to suffer most as global temperatures rise.

With the world struggling to come up with an agreement ahead of December's Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen, one important fact has been overlooked: Women are hit hardest by the extreme weather shifts, according to a new UN report.

   I am not sure what to say about this other than...Really? We have resorted to these kind of tactics to try to get a climate deal? Please...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Copenhagen Failure Squarely On Obama?

   An opinion piece in SpegielOnline today lays the blame on Hopenchange himself Barack Obama, if the climate talks in Copenhagen fail.
After blaming Bush for a bunch of stuff...
 
The folder labeled "climate change" that George W. Bush left behind for his successor on the desk of the Oval Office in January likely wasn't a thick one. Although Bush once said that America is overly dependent on oil, he never got beyond that insight. He was too busy waging war on Iraq and searching for a legal basis for extraordinary renditions to pay much attention to the real threat facing humanity. "Forget the climate" seems to have been Bush's unofficial motto.
   ...the writer goes on to lay the same thing on Obama.
 
But few people expected that Barack Obama, of all people, would continue his predecessor's climate change plan. When he took office at the beginning of 2009, it was clear that the success of the UN Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen in December depended almost entirely on the US -- that America needed to take a clear leadership role on a problem that could shake civilization to its very core.
 
   Obama lied-the planet died! I guess maybe they are getting a taste of what we on the right knew before he was even elected; that he said what he needed to say to get elected. Then when he got the power, he realized he was far in over his head.
Amateur...Squared.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Need Money To fight Global Warming

   Bangledesh announced today that rich countries need to to give them $10 Billion dollars to battle climate change. Okay...
 
Bangladesh said Tuesday it would need 10 billion dollars from rich countries in the next four years to offset the effects of climate change -- double its original estimate.

The government had previously said it would seek five billion dollars at next month's climate summit in Copenhagen to help it adapt to increased flooding, cyclones and droughts.

But Environment Minister Hasan Mahmud told AFP that as one of the countries worst affected by climate change, Bangladesh had re-evaluated its adaptation needs.

"We need at least 10 billion dollars in the next four years to adapt to and mitigate the impact of climate change in our country," Mahmud said.
 
   Well, why not. We are printing money like there is no tomorrow. What's another $10 Billion? Besides, we don't know where half the money we are giving out is going anyway!
 

Here's a stimulus success story: In Arizona's 9th Congressional District, 30 jobs have been saved or created with just $761,420 in federal stimulus spending. At least that's what the website set up by the Obama Administration to track the $787 billion stimulus says.

There's one problem, though: There is no 9th Congressional District in Arizona; the state has only eight Congressional Districts.

There's no 86th Congressional District in Arizona either, but the government's recovery.gov Web site says $34 million in stimulus money has been spent there.

   With nearly $1 trillion dollars getting handed out all over the country, I guess some of it is going to get lost...or something.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is What You Eat Personal?

   Apparently not, according to the leftists at the Washington Post. Everyone should get on a vegi-diet because it is better for the planet; and your killing it by eating meat!
 
Here's why: The livestock industry as a result of its reliance on corn and soy-based feed accounts for over half the synthetic fertilizer used in the United States, contributing more than any other sector to marine dead zones. It consumes 70 percent of the water in the American West -- water so heavily subsidized that if irrigation supports were removed, ground beef would cost $35 a pound. Livestock accounts for at least 21 percent of greenhouse-gas emissions globally -- more than all forms of transportation combined. Domestic animals -- most of them healthy -- consume about 70 percent of all the antibiotics produced. Undigested antibiotics leach from manure into freshwater systems and impair the sex organs of fish.
 
   What does that last line have to do with anything? It doesn't end there though...
 
It takes a gallon of gasoline to produce a pound of conventional beef. If all the grain fed to animals went to people, you could feed China and India. That's just a start.
 
   No story is complete without the mention of global warming, especially when cows are involved...
 
"Grass-fed" beef produces four times the methane -- a greenhouse gas 21 times as powerful as carbon dioxide -- of grain-fed cows, and many grass-fed cows are raised on heavily fertilized and irrigated grass. Pastured pigs are still typically mutilated, fed commercial feed and prevented from rooting -- their most basic instinct besides sex.
 
   So, he has touched on the reasons for being a vegetarian and the damage that meat production does to the environment. But he has one more to add:
 
Issues of animal welfare are equally implicated in all forms of meat production. Domestic animals suffer immensely, feel pain and may even be cognizant of the fate that awaits them. In an egg factory, male chicks (economically worthless) are summarily run through a grinder. Pigs are castrated without anesthesia, crated, tail-docked and nose-ringed. Milk cows are repeatedly impregnated through artificial insemination, confined to milking stalls and milked to yield 15 times the amount of milk they would produce under normal conditions. When calves are removed from their mothers at birth, the mothers mourn their loss with heart-rending moans.
 
   So, in one article he has managed to touch on every topic that greenies hold close to their heart. But wait, there is one more...the evil corporations!
 
Agribusiness has been vilified of late by muckraking journalists, activist filmmakers and sustainable-food advocates. We know that something has to be done to save our food from corporate interests. But I wonder -- are we ready to do what must be done? Sure, we've been inundated with ideas: eat local, vote with your fork, buy organic, support fair trade, etc. But these proposals all lack something that every successful environmental movement has always placed at its core: genuine sacrifice.
 
   A perfect score!
   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Green Christmas Gift Ideas

   From the Daily Green, we have some extreme green gifts for those enviro-nutters in your family. Here are some examples.
 
Want to start making your own food? How about this...
eglu cube
 
   Is your time almost up? Why put yourself in a plastic box...
 
bamboo coffin
 
Not hip to all the electrionic gizmo's? Don't want to be?
 
i-wood 3b
 
For the golfers in your life; corn based biodegradable golf tee's.
Biodegradable Golf Tees
 
Got a loved one living in Hawaii? This one is perfect...
 
solar-powered cooler
   Just a few good green ideas, and crazy ones, for all your loved ones.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NBC's Prime Time Green Time

   NBC has decided to put our favorite greenie on a prime time show, along with some green messages in some of the shows as well.

“30 Rock,’’ where Al Gore takes a cameo role, leads the way. Environmental themes were also added to the scripts of “The Biggest Loser,’’ “The Office,’’ “Heroes,’’ and “Community.’’

NBC Universal’s three-year “green’’ campaign has largely focused on off-camera issues like making company facilities more eco-friendly. News and information programs have also been enlisted to do stories on environmental issues, but except for one “30 Rock’’ episode two years ago, the campaign hasn’t touched the prime-time lineup.
 
   Set your DVR!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Even the Brit's Aren't Buying It Anylonger

   A new poll out in Britian the other day shows only 2 out of 5 people think global warming is man-made.
 
The findings threaten to undermine Gordon Brown's position at next month's UN climate change conference in Copenhagen, when he will push for international agreement to cut carbon emissions.

Mr Brown's hand in negotiations will be weakened if other countries think that he does not enjoy solid public support at home for his stance on global warming.
 
   The climate is changing alright, just not the way the British Prime Minister had hoped. If he isn't careful, his job may be changing as well.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can Climate Change In Months?

   According to this group of  scientists climate can change in mere months. (Via Instapundit)
 
Until now, it was thought that the mini ice age took a decade or so to take hold, on the evidence provided by Greenland ice cores. Not so, say William Patterson of the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada, and his colleagues.

The group studied a mud core from an ancient lake, Lough Monreagh, in western Ireland. Using a scalpel they sliced off layers 0.5 to 1 millimetre thick, each representing up to three months of time. No other measurements from the period have approached this level of detail.

Carbon isotopes in each slice revealed how productive the lake was and oxygen isotopes gave a picture of temperature and rainfall. They show that at the start of the Big Freeze, temperatures plummeted and lake productivity stopped within months, or a year at most. "It would be like taking Ireland today and moving it up to Svalbard" in the Arctic, says Patterson, who presented the findings at the BOREAS conference in Rovaniemi, Finland, on 31 October.
 
   Well, what do you suppose that means? Nothing, probably. If you do enough digging around and enough "scientific" research, you can get just about any answer you want to describe climate. I believe we have no clear idea what is going on. The research is good, but let's not jump to conclusions about how it all comes together.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More Government Control Hiding In The Climate Bill

   In case CO2 reaches 450 ppm in the future (currently it is about 380ppm), the cap and trade bill from the senate has a neat little clause that woiuld allow the federal governmnet to inact any type of regulation it so desires on business to control emissions.
 
   Through a Science Acadamy board, created in this bill, it will determine once we reach 450ppm what actions need to be taken to limit the bills indentified greenhouse gases, and send a recomendation to the president. He can then direct the appropriate agencies to impose those recommendations onto the private sector. That means energy companies, the oil industry, refineries, any business that emmits any amount of carbon gases could get stradled with regulations that the govenment so deems necessary. Sound great, right?
 
   Of course, the general consensus is that we will reach that within the next decade or so. With countries like China and India taking no action in regards to CO2 limiting, it seems more like a government power grab than a way to protect the people.
 
   But with so many things in our past, we the people must stand up to this, like we have thus far with the Obamacare, and demand a stop to it, or we will make sure they no longer have any power.
 
   If you click here, you can read through section 705- 707 and read for yourself the power they are giving to this Science Acadamy board and the president.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reasonable Climate Action

   If we had more of this type of action, more people might be interested in down something, instead of being robbed, by government, of their money to combat something that is not proven.
 
An olive grove in South Africa's Western Cape Province is the unlikely setting for an ambitious environmental and humanitarian project which aims to combat global warming and ease the plight of children born into AIDS-ravaged communities. It has already caught the imagination of environmentally-aware companies and individuals in Europe with its simple and straightforward approach to the global warming issue. Carbon credits are being earned by companies wishing to offset their carbon footprint by an ambitious tree planting programme in the Western Cape and other impoverished and needy areas of southern Africa. The double benefit: an improved environment for everyone, and vastly improved economic prospects for local people.

They are funding the planting of olive trees in a project set up by Carbon Credit Tree Africa, a company formed specifically to help local communities in Africa to make a positive contribution to the worldwide battle against global warming. Carbon Credit Tree Africa is the conduit through which western companies and individuals have channelled their own personal carbon credits to the benefit of the African communities, and, in the long term to the benefit of the whole planet.

Just one of these hardy trees can offset three tonnes of carbon emissions during its lifetime. So for many people the equation is starkly simple: paying for the planting of just one tree can make a significant difference, and give an individual a major carbon credit contribution

 
   What a novel idea! Come up with a market based program that will benefit everyone, not just money changers in the government.
   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hybrid Drivers Are Bad Drivers...Really!

   A report out by the National Highway Traffic Saftey Administration (NHTSA) released back in September of this year declared that drivers of Hybrides were more likely to be involved in a bicycle accident and twice as likely to be involved in a pedestrian related incident. 
This study found that pedestrian and bicyclist crashes involving both HEVs and ICE vehicles commonly occurred on roadways, in zones with low speed limits, during daytime and in clear weather, with higher incidence rates for HEVs when compared to ICE vehicles. A variety of crash factors were examined to determine the relative incidence rates of HEVs versus ICE vehicles in a range of crash scenarios. For one group of scenarios, those in which a vehicle is slowing or stopping, backing up, or entering or leaving a parking space, a statistically significant effect was found due to engine type. The HEV was two times more likely to be involved in a pedestrian crash in these situations than was an ICE vehicle. Vehicle maneuvers such as slowing or stopping, backing up, or entering or leaving a parking space, were grouped in one category based on that thesemaneuvers are potentially have occurred at very low speeds where the difference between the sound levels produced by the hybrid versus ICEvehicle is the greatest. In future analysis with a larger sample size, it would be ideal to investigate each of these maneuvers individually.Incidence rate of pedestrian crashes in scenarios when vehicles make a turn was significantly higher for HEVs when compared to ICE vehicles.There was no statistically significant difference in incidence rate of pedestrian crashes involving HEVs when compared to ICE vehicles when bothtype of vehicles were going straight.
 
   Maybe it is just coincidence, but have you noticed people that drive Hybrids can't seem to drive with the flow of traffic? They all seem to do one of two things; either they drive too slow, or they are drive like a bat out of hell.
 
Toyota Prius Race Car
 
   Just be careful out there, these drivers are nuts!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Illinois Governors Race "Heating Up"

   Just a little blurb from USA Today...
 
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) — Most of the Republican candidates for Illinois governor reject the idea that human activity contributes to global warming.

That contradicts the overwhelming consensus among climate scientists.

Five of the seven Republicans say rising temperatures have nothing to do with human pollution.

One candidate disagrees. Jim Ryan says he does believe human activity contributes, although he doesn't know how much.

Andy McKenna hasn't said what he thinks.

Major Democratic candidates Dan Hynes and Pat Quinn both say human activity does contribute to the problem.
 
   The real problem here, is that they are all wrong. There is no conclusive proof one way or the other that humans cause rising temperatures. Even USA Today's addition to the story, "That contradicts the overwhelming consensus among climate scientists" is wrong. Nearly as many disagree as agree regarding man-made warming.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama: Let's Take The Van

     How about this cool new ride the government is going to pay a cool $1.4 million dollars for...
 
 
 
  The price of the van doesn't really justify the fuel savings does it? But then again, why sell 35 of them to the general public at $40,000 a piece when you can sell one to the govenment for $1.4 million? Wonder if they got rid of the mags if the price would go down any?
 
   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cheating The System

   The auto makers are getting offered up a pretty sweet deal to build electric cars. They need help meeting the new average fuel economy standard of 35.5 MPG that will come into effect in 2016.
 
The Obama administration is proposing to spur production of electric cars with a "build one, get one free" offer: Build one "zero emission" battery-powered vehicle, and get to count it as up to two vehicles when figuring the average fuel efficiency of a new-vehicle fleet.

The details of federal fuel economy rules are what those of us who refused to take math and science classes in college will be forced to read in purgatory. But government and industry officials familiar with the proposal say it works something like this:

Say Green Motors Co. builds 200 cars that emit 300 grams of carbon dioxide a mile, and 50 all-electric cars that don't burn any petroleum to operate. Those electric cars would get a rating of 0 grams of carbon per mile, and the car maker could use a multiplier of 1.2 to 2 when counting them toward a fleet-wide average calculation. So, in the best case for the car maker, 50 electric vehicles becomes 100. And instead of averaging 300 grams per mile per vehicle, Green Motors' fleet averages 200 grams per mile per vehicle—even though the company did nothing to the bulk of its vehicles.
 
   Well, I like incentives, and this is an incentive. There are several problems that will have to be overcome with this deal. First off, they will have to find buyers of electric cars. Second, they will have to build "recharging stations" to boost the battery on long trips. Third, how are states like California going to handle the increase in power generation; they already have rolling blackouts during the summer months. Nothing like coming out to your car in the morning only to find it is not charged yet. Fourth, they have already determined that there may not be enough lithium on the planet to build as many electric cars as Obama wants on the road. And last but not least, once we start mining the entire planet looking for the lithium, how long before the eco-nutters get all bent out shape over that?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Carbon Caused Market Crash

   You know this could happen...

Plans to expand carbon markets at UN climate talks this December could trigger a second ’sub-prime’ style financial collapse and fail to protect the world from a global warming catastrophe, according to a report from Friends of the Earth.

The trade in carbon permits and credits, primarily based in Europe, was worth $126 billion in 2008 and is predicted to reach $3.1 trillion by 2020 if a global carbon market takes off, according to Friends of the Earth.

However, the majority of the trade is not between polluting industries and factories covered by carbon trading schemes, but by banks and investors who profit from speculation on the carbon markets by packaging carbon credits into increasingly complex financial products similar to sub-prime mortgages, which triggered the recent economic crash, according to the researchers.
 
   As I have noted before in this blog, somebody is going to get rich on the cap and trade B.S. and it for sure will not be you or me. And what will it do for emissions? Litlle or nothing. This current global recession is doing more for global emissions than any cap and trade program ever would.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »